Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 485
Filter
1.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 103(3): e36938, 2024 Jan 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38241533

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli infections are a global health challenge, notably in North America, Europe, Asia, and Africa. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates the effectiveness and safety of cefotaxime combined with avibactam, aiming to mitigate these infections' impact and lessen their burden on healthcare systems worldwide. METHODS: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and PICO frameworks, we conducted a comprehensive literature search across 4 primary databases on May 6, 2023. Studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of cefotaxime and avibactam were included. Key outcomes included treatment success, adverse effects, and microbiological eradication. Quality assessment utilized the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias instrument. Heterogeneity was analyzed using chi-square statistics and the I2 index. Both fixed- and random-effects models were applied as appropriate. Publication bias was rigorously evaluated using Egger linear regression test and funnel plot analysis, ensuring the study's integrity and reliability. RESULTS: The clinical cure rate derived from 8 studies showed no significant difference between the treatment groups (odds ratio [OR] = 1.97, 95% CI: 0.69 to 1.36, P = .86). Analysis of the bacterial clearance rate from the 5 studies also indicated no significant difference (OR = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.42 to 2.25, P = .36). Notably, a reduced mortality rate favoring the experimental group was observed in 6 studies (OR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.44 to 0.92, P = .012). Comprehensive sensitivity analyses and the assessment of publication bias strengthened the reliability of the results. CONCLUSIONS: Ceftazidime combined with avibactam significantly reduced mortality among patients with multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli infections, indicating its potential as a therapeutic option, especially for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. However, extensive large-scale clinical trials are required to validate these findings.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Escherichia coli Infections , Humans , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Azabicyclo Compounds/adverse effects , Azabicyclo Compounds/therapeutic use , Cefotaxime/adverse effects , Cefotaxime/therapeutic use , Ceftazidime/adverse effects , Ceftazidime/therapeutic use , Drug Combinations , Escherichia coli , Escherichia coli Infections/drug therapy , Reproducibility of Results
2.
Arch Esp Urol ; 76(5): 313-318, 2023 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37545149

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to explore the effects of cefixime on immune functions and inflammatory factors in children with urinary tract infection and to investigate its nursing strategies. METHODS: A total of 161 children with urinary tract infection who were diagnosed in our hospital from November 2019 to November 2021 were selected. All children were treated with cefixime and received targeted nursing strategies. The indices of immune functions and the levels of inflammatory factors were compared before and after the treatment. The satisfaction degree of children's family members, recurrence rate and incidence of adverse reactions were measured. RESULTS: The levels of CD3+, CD4+ and CD4+/CD8+ in children after the treatment were significantly higher but the CD8+ level was significantly lower than those before the treatment (p < 0.001). The levels of C-reactive protein, tumour necrosis factor-α and interleukin-6 after the treatment were lower than those before the treatment (p < 0.001). The average score of nursing satisfaction of children's family members was (84.53 ± 13.65) points, with the total satisfaction degree of 90.68% (146/161). Within 6 months after the treatment, only six children had urinary tract infection again and the recurrence rate was 3.73% (6/161). During the treatment, seven children had adverse reactions to the drug, with an incidence rate of 4.35% (7/161). CONCLUSIONS: Cefixime can improve the immune function of children with urinary tract infection and reduce the levels of inflammatory factors. The implementation of targeted nursing strategies can improve clinical satisfaction and reduce the recurrence rate of the disease and thus can be helpful to establish a comprehensive and efficient clinical program for children with urinary tract infection.


Subject(s)
Cefotaxime , Urinary Tract Infections , Child , Humans , Cefixime/therapeutic use , Cefotaxime/adverse effects , Urinary Tract Infections/drug therapy , Administration, Oral , Immunity
3.
Br J Clin Pharmacol ; 89(2): 544-550, 2023 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35610175

ABSTRACT

Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptom (DRESS) is a severe adverse drug-induced reaction. Commonly related to anticonvulsant and allopurinol, DRESS can affect both adults and children. Cefotaxime is rarely associated with DRESS, especially with children. We report a cefotaxime-induced DRESS in a child and emphasize the role of allergological work-up to point out the culprit drug in exploring cross-reactivity and identifying a possible cosensitization. A 2-year-old boy was treated with cefotaxime, vancomycin and metronidazole for acute otomastoiditis. Metronidazole was withdrawn and vancomycin was changed by teicoplanin 10 and 15 days later, respectively. Nineteen days after ongoing cefotaxime and 4 days after teicoplanin intake, the patient developed hyperthermia, a widespread exanthema, facial oedema with neither mucosal involvement nor palpable lymphadenopathy. Biological tests revealed eosinophilia, atypical lymphocytes, mild cytolysis and a high lactate dehydrogenase level. Serological tests for viral and bacterial infections were negative. DRESS was suspected and the 2 antibiotics were withdrawn. Intradermal tests (IDT) were carried out 2 months later with cefotaxime and teicoplanin. They revealed a positive result at 48-hour reading. To assess cross-reactivity among ß-lactams, IDT to penicillins (benzylpenicillin, amoxicillin and oxacillin) was performed showing negative results at 48-hour reading. Nevertheless, IDT to cephalosporins (cefazolin, cefuroxime, ceftazidime and ceftriaxone) displayed positive results at 48-hour reading. As a result, IDT are of great interest and should be performed to confirm the role of cefotaxime and detect a potential cross-reactivity with chemically similar drugs and drugs taken before and during the episode of DRESS.


Subject(s)
Drug Hypersensitivity Syndrome , Eosinophilia , Male , Adult , Child , Humans , Child, Preschool , Cefotaxime/adverse effects , Teicoplanin/adverse effects , Cephalosporins/adverse effects , Vancomycin/adverse effects , Drug Hypersensitivity Syndrome/diagnosis , Drug Hypersensitivity Syndrome/etiology , Metronidazole , Eosinophilia/chemically induced , Eosinophilia/diagnosis
4.
CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol ; 11(7): 906-918, 2022 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35583200

ABSTRACT

Recent studies have highlighted the importance of ecological interactions in dysbiosis of gut microbiota, but few focused on their role in antibiotic-induced perturbations. We used the data from the CEREMI trial in which 22 healthy volunteers received a 3-day course of ceftriaxone or cefotaxime antibiotics. Fecal samples were analyzed by 16S rRNA gene profiling, and the total bacterial counts were determined in each sample by flux cytometry. As the gut exposure to antibiotics could not be experimentally measured despite a marked impact on the gut microbiota, it was reconstructed using the counts of susceptible Escherichia coli. The dynamics of absolute counts of bacterial families were analyzed using a generalized Lotka-Volterra equations and nonlinear mixed effect modeling. Bacterial interactions were studied using a stepwise approach. Two negative and three positive interactions were identified. Introducing bacterial interactions in the modeling approach better fitted the data, and provided different estimates of antibiotic effects on each bacterial family than a simple model without interaction. The time to return to 95% of the baseline counts was significantly longer in ceftriaxone-treated individuals than in cefotaxime-treated subjects for two bacterial families: Akkermansiaceae (median [range]: 11.3 days [0; 180.0] vs. 4.2 days [0; 25.6], p = 0.027) and Tannerellaceae (13.7 days [6.1; 180.0] vs. 6.2 days [5.4; 17.3], p = 0.003). Taking bacterial interaction as well as individual antibiotic exposure profile into account improves the analysis of antibiotic-induced dysbiosis.


Subject(s)
Gastrointestinal Microbiome , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Bacteria/genetics , Cefotaxime/adverse effects , Ceftriaxone/adverse effects , Dysbiosis/chemically induced , Dysbiosis/drug therapy , Gastrointestinal Microbiome/genetics , Humans , RNA, Ribosomal, 16S/genetics
5.
Microbiol Spectr ; 9(3): e0076121, 2021 12 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34756070

ABSTRACT

Lyme disease (LD) is a heavy public health burden. The most common manifestations of LD include erythema migrans (EM), Lyme neuroborreliosis (LNB), and Lyme arthritis (LA). The efficacy and safety of antibiotics for treating LD is still controversial. Thus, we performed a network meta-analysis (NMA) to obtain more data and tried to solve this problem. We searched studies in the databases of Embase and PubMed from the date of their establishments until 22 April 2021. Odds ratios (ORs) were used to assess dichotomous outcomes. A total of 31 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 2,748 patients and 11 antibiotics were included. Oral amoxicillin (1.5 g/day), oral azithromycin (0.5 g/day), injectable ceftriaxone, and injectable cefotaxime were effective for treating LD (range of ORs, 1.02 to 1,610.43). Cefuroxime and penicillin were safe for treating LD (range of ORs, 0.027 to 0.98). Amoxicillin was effective for treating EM (range of ORs, 1.18 to 25.66). Based on the results, we thought oral amoxicillin (1.5 g/day), oral azithromycin (0.5 g/day), injectable ceftriaxone, and injectable cefotaxime were effective for treating LD. Cefuroxime and penicillin were safe for treating LD. Amoxicillin was effective for treating EM. We did not observe evidence proving the advantage of doxycycline in efficacy and safety for treating LD, LA, LNB, and EM of children or adults. We did not have sufficient data to prove the significant difference of efficacy for treating LA and LNB in adults and LD in children, the significant difference of safety of oral drugs for treating LD, and the significant difference of safety of drugs for treating EM. IMPORTANCE Some previous studies investigated the efficacy and safety of antibiotics for treating Lyme disease (LD). However, due to technical limitations, several questions regarding the routes of drug administration and the dosages of drug are still unclear, which might be causing problems for clinicians. Hence, we performed network meta-analysis (NMA) to quantitatively analyze the clinical data published during the last 40 years. Here, we demonstrate the evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of antibiotics commonly used for treating LD in adults and children. We found that amoxicillin, azithromycin, ceftriaxone, and cefotaxime were effective for treating LD, but we did not observe significant efficacy and safety of doxycycline for treating LD.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Lyme Disease/drug therapy , Administration, Oral , Adult , Amoxicillin/adverse effects , Amoxicillin/therapeutic use , Azithromycin/adverse effects , Azithromycin/therapeutic use , Borrelia burgdorferi/drug effects , Borrelia burgdorferi Group/drug effects , Cefotaxime/adverse effects , Cefotaxime/therapeutic use , Ceftriaxone/adverse effects , Ceftriaxone/therapeutic use , Child , Doxycycline/adverse effects , Doxycycline/therapeutic use , Humans , Injections/adverse effects , Network Meta-Analysis , Penicillins/adverse effects , Penicillins/therapeutic use
6.
Front Immunol ; 12: 698541, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35003054

ABSTRACT

Background: ABO blood type incompatibility hemolytic disease of newborn (ABO-HDN) and drug-induced immune hemolytic anemia (DIIHA) due to non-immunologic protein adsorption (NIPA) mainly cause extravascular hemolysis. All the reported severe DIIHA were caused by drug-induced antibodies, and rare report of acute intravascular hemolysis was caused by the NIPA mechanism or ABO-HDN. Case presentation: We report the first case of acute intravascular hemolysis induced by cefotaxime sodium - sulbactam sodium (CTX - SBT) in a case of ABO-HDN which resulted in death at 55 h after birth. The mother's blood type was O and RhD-positive, and the newborn's blood type was B and RhD-positive. No irregular red blood cell (RBC) antibodies or drug-dependent antibodies related to CTX or SBT was detected in the mother's plasma and the plasma or the RBC acid eluent of the newborn. Before the newborn received CTX - SBT treatment, the result of direct antiglobulin test (DAT) was negative while anti-B was positive (2 +) in both plasma and acid eluent. After the newborn received CTX - SBT treatment, the results of DAT for anti-IgG and anti-C3d were both positive, while anti-B was not detected in plasma, but stronger anti-B (3 +) was detected in acid eluent. In vitro experiments confirmed that NIPA of SBT promoted the specific binding of maternal-derived IgG anti-B to B antigen on RBCs of the newborn, thereby inducing acute intravascular hemolysis. Conclusion: The NIPA effect of SBT promoted the specific binding of mother-derived IgG anti-B in newborn's plasma to the newborn's RBC B antigens and formed an immune complex, and then activated complement, which led to acute intravascular hemolysis. Drugs such as SBT with NIPA effect should not be used for newborns with HDN.


Subject(s)
ABO Blood-Group System/immunology , Anemia, Hemolytic/chemically induced , Blood Group Incompatibility/complications , Cefotaxime/adverse effects , Erythroblastosis, Fetal/etiology , Hemolysis , Immunoglobulin G/immunology , Isoantibodies/immunology , Sulbactam/adverse effects , Acute Disease , Adsorption , Anemia, Hemolytic/blood , Antigen-Antibody Reactions , Blood Group Incompatibility/blood , Cefotaxime/administration & dosage , Complement Activation , Coombs Test , Erythroblastosis, Fetal/blood , Erythrocyte Membrane/chemistry , Erythrocyte Membrane/immunology , Fatal Outcome , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Male , Maternal-Fetal Exchange , Pregnancy , Sulbactam/administration & dosage , Young Adult
7.
Sci Rep ; 8(1): 16076, 2018 10 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30375423

ABSTRACT

Previous studies on bacterial response to antibiotics mainly focused on susceptible strains. Here we characterized the transcriptional responses of distinct cephalosporin-resistant bacteria of public health relevance to cefotaxime (CTX), a cephalosporin widely used in clinical practice. Adaptation to therapeutic concentrations of CTX (30 µg/ml) was investigated by RNA sequencing in mid-exponential phase cultures of a methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and two genetically diverse E. coli producing CTX-M-15 or CMY-2 ß-lactamase following genome sequencing and annotation for each strain. MRSA showed the most notable adaptive changes in the transcriptome after exposure to CTX, mainly associated with cell envelope functions. This reprogramming coincided with a transient reduction in cell growth, which also occurred in the CMY-2-producing E. coli but not in the CTX-M-15-producing strain. Re-establishment of growth in the CMY-2 producer proceeded without any notable adaptive transcriptional response, while limited reprogramming of gene transcription was observed in the CTX-M-15 producer. Our data show that the transcriptional response of CTX-resistant bacteria to CTX depends on the bacterial species, level of resistance and resistance determinant involved. Gene products induced in the presence of CTX may play an essential role for bacterial survival during therapy and merit further investigation as possible targets for potentiating CTX.


Subject(s)
Cefotaxime/adverse effects , Escherichia coli/genetics , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/genetics , beta-Lactamases/genetics , Cefotaxime/therapeutic use , Escherichia coli/drug effects , Escherichia coli/pathogenicity , Gene Expression Profiling , Humans , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/pathogenicity , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Transcriptome/genetics , beta-Lactams/metabolism
8.
Hum Exp Toxicol ; 36(6): 547-553, 2017 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27402682

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Biliary lithiasis, or sludge, and nephrolithiasis have been reported as a possible complication of ceftriaxone therapy. However, no study related to cefotaxime-induced biliary pseudolithiasis or nephrolithiasis was observed in the literature. Therefore, we investigated the comparative formation of biliary pseudolithiasis and nephrolithiasis after cefotaxime and ceftriaxone therapies. METHODS: The patients treated with ceftriaxone or cefotaxime were enrolled during the study period. Ultrasound imaging of the biliary and urinary tract was performed in all patients before and after the treatment. The patients with a positive sonographic finding at the end of treatment were followed up with monthly ultrasonography for 3 months. RESULTS: The present study showed that abnormal biliary sonographic findings were demonstrated in 18 children (20.9%) treated with ceftriaxone, 13 (15.1%) had biliary lithiasis, 5 (5.8%) had biliary sludge and 1 (1.2%) had nephrolithiasis. Abnormal biliary sonographic findings were demonstrated in only four (5.9%) children treated with cefotaxime who had biliary sludge and only one (1.5%) had nephrolithiasis. It was observed that older age was at significantly higher risk of developing biliary sludge or stone formation. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to determine the residual risk and analysis found that 4.5 years was the cut-off value for age. CONCLUSIONS: The present study is unique in the literature for reporting for the first time gall bladder sludge and nephrolithiasis associated with cefotaxime use. Therefore, patients treated with cefotaxime should be monitored for serious complications like patients treated with ceftriaxone. Nevertheless, if third-generation cephalosporin is used, cefotaxime is recommended to be used rather than ceftriaxone.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Bile/drug effects , Cefotaxime/adverse effects , Ceftriaxone/adverse effects , Lithiasis/chemically induced , Nephrolithiasis/chemically induced , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Lithiasis/diagnostic imaging , Male , Nephrolithiasis/diagnostic imaging , Ultrasonography
9.
Pan Afr Med J ; 28: 218, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29629004

ABSTRACT

Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome is a rare and potentially life-threatening idiosyncratic drug reaction. It presents with extensive rash, fever, lymphadenopathy, hematologic abnormalities (eosinophilia and/or atypical lymphocytosis) and internal organ involvement. It has been described in association with more than 50 drugs. To the best of our knowledge neither cefotaxime nor clindamycin has been previously reported to induce DRESS syndrome in children. Clindamycin was reported only in adults as a cause of DRESS syndrome in the literature. In this report, we aimed to present a child with DRESS syndrome that developed after cefotaxime and clindamycin treatment. A 6-year-old boy was diagnosed with the left lower lobe pneumonia and pleural effusion. Parenteral cefotaxime and clindamycin were then started, after which the patient improved clinically and was discharged 7 days later with oral amoxicillin clavulanate treatment. After four days he was readmitted to the hospital with fever and cough. Chest X-ray revealed left lower lobe pneumonia and pleural effusion. We considered that the pneumonia was unresponsive to oral antibiotic treatment, and therefore parenteral cefotaxime and clindamycin were re-administered. As a result, his clinical and radiological findings were improved within 10 days. On the 12th of day of hospitalization, the body temperature has risen to 39°C, which we considered to be caused by antibiotics and stopped antibiotic treatment. At the same day he developed generalized maculopapular erythematous rash, which was considered an allergic reaction secondary to antibiotics. Despite the antihistaminic drug administration, the clinical status quickly deteriorated with generalized edema, lymphadenopathies and hepatosplenomegaly. Laboratory tests revealed a white blood cell count of 4300/µl, a lymphocyte count of 1300/µl, a hemoglobin level of 11.2 gr/dl, a platelet count of 120.000/µl, an eosinophilia ratio of 10% on peripheral blood smear, a C-reactive protein level of 20 mg/dl, a procalcitonin level of 23.94 ng/ml and an erythrocyte sedimentation rate of 48 mm/h. Anti nuclear antibody, anti-double stranded DNA, the serologic tests for Epstein Bar virus, herpes simplex virus, parvovirus, mycoplasma, toxoplasmosis, rubella, cytomegalovirus were all found negative. Bone marrow aspiration was consistent with an autoimmune reaction. An echocardiographic examination was normal. Thoracic tomography revealed multiple enlarged axillary, supraclavicular and anterior mediastinal lymph nodes. As the patient met 8 out of 9 RegiSCAR criteria for the diagnosis of DRESS, we started pulse methyl prednisolone (30 mg/kg/day) for three days followed by 2 mg/kg/day. On the 2nd day fever resolved and cutaneous rash and edema improved. Ten days after developing eruptions the patient was discharged. To our knowledge, we report the first pediatric case of DRESS syndrome following treatment with cefotaxime and clindamycin. Pediatricians should be aware of this potential complication associated with these commonly prescribed antibiotics.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Cefotaxime/adverse effects , Clindamycin/adverse effects , Drug Hypersensitivity Syndrome/etiology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , C-Reactive Protein/metabolism , Cefotaxime/administration & dosage , Child , Clindamycin/administration & dosage , Humans , Male , Methylprednisolone/therapeutic use , Pleural Effusion/drug therapy , Pneumonia/drug therapy
10.
Pediatr Hematol Oncol ; 33(7-8): 441-456, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27922762

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: A prospective evaluation of nonchemotherapy drug-induced agranulocytosis (DIA) cases, which are infrequent in the pediatric population. We characterize agranulocytosis cases and assess lab test differences between drug- and nondrug-induced agranulocytosis. METHODS: Through our Prospective Pharmacovigilance Program from Laboratory Signals at Hospital we detected pediatric agranulocytosis cases from July 2007 to December 2010. This program estimates the incidence, drug causality, clinical features, outcomes of DIA pediatric cases, and assesses laboratory differences with respect to non-DIA. RESULTS: We detected 662 agranulocytosis in 308 pediatric patients, of which 14 were caused by nonchemotherapy drugs. The incidence rate of DIA for 10,000 pediatric patients was 3.92 (Poisson 95% confidence interval 1.09-8.77); 78.6% of DIA cases occurred in patients younger than 3 years. The final outcome was recovery without sequela in all cases. The pharmacologic group most frequently implicated was antimicrobial drugs (11 drugs), 7 of which were beta-lactams. The drugs most frequently suspected were cefotaxime and vancomycin (3 cases each). We found 3 drugs (cloperastine, codeine, and enoxaparin) not previously described to induce DIA. Automatic linear modeling (n = 56, R2 = 45.2%) showed a significant inverse association with platelets (R2 = 17.5%), hemoglobin, and alanine transaminase, and a direct association with red cell distribution (R2 = 16.2%). A generalized linear model (Type III, n = 1188; DIA, n = 86; likelihood ratio chi-squared = 156.16) retained eosinophils (p <.001), platelets (p <.001), total serum proteins (p <.001), and hemoglobin (p =.039). CONCLUSIONS: We found a higher incidence of DIA in children than previously described. Our findings also suggest an immune-mediated destruction or myeloid toxicity, possibly facilitated by an increase in drug exposure.


Subject(s)
Agranulocytosis , Cefotaxime/adverse effects , Codeine/adverse effects , Enoxaparin/adverse effects , Piperidines/adverse effects , Vancomycin/adverse effects , Age Factors , Agranulocytosis/chemically induced , Agranulocytosis/diagnosis , Agranulocytosis/epidemiology , Agranulocytosis/therapy , Cefotaxime/administration & dosage , Child , Child, Preschool , Codeine/administration & dosage , Enoxaparin/administration & dosage , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Piperidines/administration & dosage , Prospective Studies , Vancomycin/administration & dosage
11.
Eur J Neurol ; 22(9): 1249-59, 2015 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26058321

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Our aim was to evaluate the available evidence for pharmacological treatment of acute Lyme neuroborreliosis as a basis for evidence-based clinical recommendations in a systematic review. METHODS: A systematic literature search of Medline, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library and three trial registries was performed. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized studies (NRS) were evaluated. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tools. The primary outcome was 'residual neurological symptoms' whilst the secondary outcomes were disability, quality of life, pain, fatigue, depression, cognition, sleep, adverse events and cerebrospinal fluid pleocytosis. The quality of the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. RESULTS: After screening 5779 records, eight RCTs and eight NRS were included. Risk of bias was generally high. No statistically significant difference was found between doxycycline and beta-lactam antibiotics in a meta-analysis regarding residual neurological symptoms at 4-12 months [risk ratio (RR) 1.27, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.98-1.63, P = 0.07] or adverse events (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.54-1.25, P = 0.35). Significantly fewer neurological symptoms for cefotaxime compared with penicillin were found (RR 1.81, 95% CI 1.10-2.97, P = 0.02). Adverse events were significantly fewer for penicillin (RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.38-0.84, P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Evidence regarding pharmacological treatment of acute Lyme neuroborreliosis is scarce and therefore insufficient to recommend preference of beta-lactam antibiotics over doxycycline or vice versa. However, due to considerable imprecision, relevant differences between treatments cannot be excluded. No evidence suggesting benefits of extended antibiotic treatments could be identified. Further well-designed trials are needed. Individual treatment decisions should address patients' preferences and individual conditions like prior allergic reactions.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Cefotaxime/pharmacology , Doxycycline/pharmacology , Lyme Neuroborreliosis/drug therapy , Penicillins/pharmacology , beta-Lactams/pharmacology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Cefotaxime/administration & dosage , Cefotaxime/adverse effects , Doxycycline/administration & dosage , Doxycycline/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Penicillins/administration & dosage , Penicillins/adverse effects , beta-Lactams/administration & dosage , beta-Lactams/adverse effects
12.
Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol ; 59(5): 360-4, 2015.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25052739

ABSTRACT

Osteoarticular infection in children frequently occurs before 10 years of age. Surgical drainage is sometimes required, whereas acute osteomyelitis can be treated with antibiotic therapy alone. The duration of antibiotic therapy varies, 2 weeks is sufficient for septic arthritis, whereas 6 weeks is often required for complicated cases. Some of these antibiotic drugs present direct complications with low clinical impact in certain individuals. Hypersensitivity to these drugs causes different reactions in children. DRESS syndrome (Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms) is a severe and potentially life-threatening drug reaction. It is characterised by high fever, malaise, lymphadenopathy and skin rash. From a clinical perspective, these symptoms can lead to an exacerbation of the initial infectious process for which treatment was commenced. The liver is the organ most often affected in DRESS syndrome associated with haematological changes, potentially similar to sepsis. We present two cases of children with osteoarticular infections who developed DRESS syndrome after antibiotic therapy. Both patients made a complete recovery after cessation of the antibiotic drugs used.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Arthritis, Infectious/drug therapy , Cefotaxime/adverse effects , Cloxacillin/adverse effects , Drug Hypersensitivity Syndrome/etiology , Knee Joint , Osteomyelitis/drug therapy , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Cefotaxime/therapeutic use , Child , Cloxacillin/therapeutic use , Drug Hypersensitivity Syndrome/diagnosis , Drug Therapy, Combination , Humans , Male
13.
Korean J Hepatol ; 18(1): 84-8, 2012 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22511907

ABSTRACT

Hepatitis A virus (HAV) infections occur predominantly in children, and are usually self-limiting. However, 75-95% of the infections in adults are symptomatic (mostly with jaundice), with the illness symptoms usually persisting for a few weeks. Atypical manifestations include relapsing hepatitis, prolonged cholestasis, and complications involving renal injury. Drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome is a severe, drug-induced hypersensitivity reaction characterized by skin rash, fever, lymph-node enlargement, and internal organ involvement. We describe a 22-year-old male who presented with acute kidney injury and was diagnosed with prolonged cholestatic hepatitis A. The patient also developed DRESS syndrome due to antibiotic and/or antiviral treatment. To our knowledge, this is the first report of histopathologically confirmed DRESS syndrome due to antibiotic and/or antiviral treatment following HAV infection with cholestatic features and renal injury.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Cholestasis/diagnosis , Exanthema/chemically induced , Hepatitis A/diagnosis , Acute Kidney Injury/diagnosis , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Cefotaxime/adverse effects , Cefotaxime/therapeutic use , Cholestasis/complications , Cytomegalovirus/genetics , Cytomegalovirus Infections/drug therapy , Cytomegalovirus Infections/virology , DNA, Viral/analysis , Eosinophilia/etiology , Exanthema/pathology , Ganciclovir/therapeutic use , Hepatitis A/complications , Hepatitis A/drug therapy , Humans , Hydrocortisone/therapeutic use , Immunoglobulins/therapeutic use , Male , Syndrome , Young Adult
16.
Clin Med Res ; 10(1): 32-5, 2012 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21817121

ABSTRACT

We report two cases, one of a 52-year-old man and one of a 32-year-old man, who were treated with cefotaxime. On day 23 and day 28 of the treatment, respectively, the patients manifested clinically with fever, pruriginous skin rash, and facial edema. Blood tests showed marked eosinophilia and atypical lymphocytosis for both patients, and hepatic cytolysis only in the second patient. Cefotaxime was discontinued in both patients; the clinico-biological picture improved gradually and completely disappeared approximately 4 weeks later. Six weeks after complete recovery, both patients underwent intradermal testing which was positive to cefotaxime (2 mg/ml) at the 48-hour reading and negative to benzylpenicillin, amoxicillin, and cefazolin at the 20-minute and 48-hour readings. These clinical pictures suggest drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) induced by cefotaxime. To the best of our knowledge, only one case of cefotaxime-induced DRESS has been reported in the medical literature. Thus, we add two new cases of cefotaxime-induced DRESS and emphasize the usefulness and safety of intradermal testing in establishing the diagnosis.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Cefotaxime/adverse effects , Edema , Eosinophilia , Lymphocytosis , Skin Diseases , Adult , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Cefotaxime/administration & dosage , Edema/blood , Edema/chemically induced , Edema/pathology , Eosinophilia/blood , Eosinophilia/chemically induced , Eosinophilia/pathology , Humans , Lymphocytosis/blood , Lymphocytosis/chemically induced , Lymphocytosis/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Skin Diseases/blood , Skin Diseases/chemically induced , Skin Diseases/pathology
17.
Article in English | WPRIM (Western Pacific) | ID: wpr-102516

ABSTRACT

Hepatitis A virus (HAV) infections occur predominantly in children, and are usually self-limiting. However, 75-95% of the infections in adults are symptomatic (mostly with jaundice), with the illness symptoms usually persisting for a few weeks. Atypical manifestations include relapsing hepatitis, prolonged cholestasis, and complications involving renal injury. Drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome is a severe, drug-induced hypersensitivity reaction characterized by skin rash, fever, lymph-node enlargement, and internal organ involvement. We describe a 22-year-old male who presented with acute kidney injury and was diagnosed with prolonged cholestatic hepatitis A. The patient also developed DRESS syndrome due to antibiotic and/or antiviral treatment. To our knowledge, this is the first report of histopathologically confirmed DRESS syndrome due to antibiotic and/or antiviral treatment following HAV infection with cholestatic features and renal injury.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Young Adult , Acute Kidney Injury/diagnosis , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Cefotaxime/adverse effects , Cholestasis/complications , Cytomegalovirus/genetics , Cytomegalovirus Infections/drug therapy , DNA, Viral/analysis , Eosinophilia/etiology , Exanthema/chemically induced , Ganciclovir/therapeutic use , Hepatitis A/complications , Hydrocortisone/therapeutic use , Immunoglobulins/therapeutic use , Syndrome
18.
Arch Pediatr ; 17(11): 1559-61, 2010 Nov.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20880680

ABSTRACT

Acute interstitial nephritis accounts for about 10 % of the cases of acute renal failure. An adverse drug reaction caused by an immunoallergic mechanism is suggested when fever, skin rash, eosinophilia, and eosinophiluria are associated. The outcome is favorable after withdrawal of drug therapy in most cases. We report a case of acute interstitial nephritis induced by immunoallergic drug mechanisms, in a 3-week-old infant who presented with acute renal failure associated with eosinophilia and hepatitis and who had received cefotaxime and gentamicin. The patient's progression was favorable with normalization of renal and liver function 1 week after suspension of antibiotic drugs.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Cefotaxime/adverse effects , Gentamicins/adverse effects , Nephritis, Interstitial/chemically induced , Acute Disease , Eosinophilia/chemically induced , Hepatitis/etiology , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Male
19.
Fundam Clin Pharmacol ; 24(4): 429-32, 2010 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19925632

ABSTRACT

We report a case of acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP) after cefotaxime use confirmed by a positive patch test. A 30-year-old woman received cefotaxime, fosfomycin and ciprofloxacin for sinusitis. Twelve days after drug initiation, she developed an extending pustular erythema associated with fever. Laboratory investigations showed marked leukocytosis. His blood chemistry was normal. The histological examination showed parakeratosis, spongiosis and nonfollicular intra-epidermal pustules consistent with AGEP. All medications were withdrawn. The symptoms resolved within 11 days after cefotaxime discontinuation. Patch tests were positive to cefotaxime after 48 h, while ciprofloxacin and fosfomycin yielded negative findings. Based on the Naranjo algorithm, it is probable that AGEP reaction was caused by cefotaxime. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of AGEP associated with positive cefotaxime patch testing.


Subject(s)
Acute Generalized Exanthematous Pustulosis/chemically induced , Acute Generalized Exanthematous Pustulosis/diagnosis , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Cefotaxime/adverse effects , Drug Eruptions/diagnosis , Adult , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Cefotaxime/administration & dosage , Cefotaxime/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , Patch Tests , Sinusitis/drug therapy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...